MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W35565855 · doi:10.7202/016726ar

Le péché de « nivellement » dans la traduction littéraire

2007· article· fr· W35565855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Françoise Wuilmart

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Un texte d’auteur s’écarte par définition de la norme langagière et acquiert un certain « relief littéraire ». Un des dangers qui guette le traducteur non averti est le nivellement de ce relief complexe. Un autre danger est la recréation réductrice, c’est-à-dire réduite à une prise de sens individuelle et à une réécriture soucieuse d’adaptation et donc mutilante. Le texte d’auteur est polysémique et son nivellement peut se produire à plusieurs niveaux : lexical et stylistique, culturel, et idéel. Le traducteur littéraire de bon aloi devrait donc se libérer du carcan de la langue d’arrivée et la traiter comme un organe vivant, susceptible d’accueillir l’Autre de l’auteur, et l’Autre de la culture source.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteurs→Same topicTranslation Studies and Practices→French-language works237,207→