MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W35712514 · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.912935

The Power of a Single Feather: Meech Lake, Indigenous Resistance and the Evolution of Indigenous Politics in Canada

2011· article· en· W35712514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Peach

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d'études constitutionnelles · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPostdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthJiangsu Province's Key Provincial Talents ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIndigenousPoliticsEthnologyPolitical scienceColonialismResistance (ecology)GeographyHumanitiesPublic administrationSociologyLawArtEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EnglishThe summer of 1990 was a pivotal moment for Indigenous peoples in Canada. That summer, Indigenous peoples expressed their resistance to colonialism through their key role in the defeat of the Meech Lake Accord and through direct action at Oka, Quebec. The effects of these events were felt in the inclusion of Indigenous organizations in the negotiation of the Charlottetown Accord, the recognition of the inherent right to self-government, the establishment of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal peoples, and the regular inclusion of representatives ofnational Indigenous organizations in meetings with premiers and first ministers today. As the memory of that period faded in the public consciousness, so too did the momentum to address Indigenous aspirations for greater inclusion in the structure of the federation. This article explores how the Meech Lake Accord provided a trigger for a wave ofIndigenous resistance to the colonialism of Canadian constitutionalpoliticsandthe implications ofthat resistance for national politics andAboriginal policy. It also explores how the momentum of that period faded and raises the question of what could lead to a renewal of the momentum that existed in the aftermath of the summer of 1990. francaisL'ti 1990 fur un moment central pour les Autochrones du Canada. Cet iti-la, le peuple autochrone a manifesti sa risistance au colonialisme par le biais du rle cldi qu'il a jou dans l'dchec de lAccord du lac Meech et son action directe h Oka (Qudbec). Les efersde ces ivinementssesontfaitsentir dans l'inclusion d'organisations autochrones lors des negociations entourant lAccord de Charlottetown, la reconnaissance du droit inhirent h l'autonomie gouvernementale, la crdation de la Commission royale sur les peuples autochrones ainsi que l'inclusion rigulibre de reprisentants d'organisations autochrones nationales aux rencontres des premiers ministres. Cependant, au fur et h mesure que le souvenir de cette piriode s'effaa de la conscience publique, I'llan i aborder les aspirations autochtones a une meilleure inclusion dans la structure de la fiddration seffaa igalement. L'auteur examinera la fafon dont lAccord du lac Meech a dilenchi une vague de risistance autochrone au colonialisme de la politique constitutionnelle canadienne ainsi que les implications de cette risistance pour la politique nationale et autochrone. L'auteur examinera igalement comment le dynamisme de cecte piriode s'est efact et soulivera la question suivante : qu'est-ce qui pourrai mener h un regain du dynamisme qui existait t la suite de l'iti 1990?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d'études constitutionnellesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207