MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W35890538 · doi:10.3390/polym14142763

Influence of Steroids and Gonadotropins on Reproduction in Beef Cattle

2014· article· en· W35890538 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. L. Devine

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymers · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsReproductionBeef cattleBiologyEndocrinologyAnimal scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this thesis was to evaluate the influence of steroids and gonadotropins on reproduction in beef cattle. In experiment 1, beef heifers were used to determine the influence of growth-promoting implants on growth, reproductive development, estrous behavior, and pregnancy rate. Heifers were assigned to 1 of 4 implant treatment groups: control (CON); trenbolone acetate (TBA); trenbolone acetate plus estradiol (TBA+E2) or zeranol (ZER). Heifers were implanted once, A.I. and exposed to bull during this experiment. Body weight, BCS, HH, RTS, estrous behavior and pregnancy data were collected throughout this experiment. Average daily gain of heifers was greater for TBA+E2 heifers. Fewer heifers treated with ZER were classified with a cyclic RTS on d 106 than CON and TBA treated heifers while heifers treated with TBA+E2 were similar to all treatments. Heifers treated with TBA had increased mounts during estrus compared with all other treatments. Overall and A.I pregnancy rates did not differ among treatments.In experiment 2, superovulated beef donors were utilized to determine the feasibility of performing a cow-side LH assay (PrediBov®) on superovulated donors, with emphasis on determining how to use the results in a commercial program. Donors were subjected to superstimulation; blood samples were collected starting at CIDR removal, continuing every 6 h until a positive test was acquired or 36 h after CIDR removal. Whole blood (0.5 mL) was submitted to the assay and donors were inseminated approximately 12 and 24 h after a positive test or onset of estrus. The majority of positive LH tests occurred within 12 to 24 h after CIDR removal. Forty-four percent of the positive tests occurred 0 to 6 h after the onset of estrus. Donors that were inseminated 6 to 10 h after a positive LH test produced more viable and grade 1 embryos than donors inseminated either < 6 or 10 to 14 h after a positive test. There were no differences in embryo production between insemination times from the onset of estrus or between donors inseminated approximately 12 and 24 h after a positive test or the onset of estrus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymersSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207