Le tourisme en milieu autochtone : sous le sceau de l’authenticité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to clarify the biological and clinical significance of a tandem duplicate of <i>bla</i><sub>VIM-24</sub> in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> ST1816 isolates. Thirteen ST1816 isolates carrying a plasmid harboring <i>bla</i><sub>VIMs</sub> were obtained from two medical settings in Japan between 2016 and 2019. Complete sequencing revealed that, of the 13 plasmids, four had a tandem duplicate of <i>bla</i><sub>VIM-24</sub>. These four plasmids harbored a replicon, a relaxase gene, and T4SS genes belonging to IncP-9, MOB<sub>F</sub>, and MPF<sub>T</sub>, respectively. All four plasmids transferred to PAO1 by filter mating. Cefepime marginally affected the growth of PAO1, carrying a pUCP19 harboring the tandem duplicate. Western blotting analysis showed that the relative intensity of VIM-24 metallo-β-lactamase produced by a PAO1 transformant containing a tandem duplicate was 2.6-fold higher than that produced by a PAO1 transformant containing a single copy. These results suggest that the tandem duplicate of <i>bla</i><sub>VIM-24</sub> in plasmids may confer resistance against cefepime, enabling <i>P. aeruginosa</i> ST1816 strains to proliferate in hospitals in Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".