Leptospirose (Morbus Weil) in Augsburg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HISTORY: Three unrelated patients presented within three months at the Central Hospital of Augsburg, Southern Germany, with jaundice of initially unknown etiology. Patient (Pt.) 1, a 51-year old man was admitted with a history of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, jaundice and anuria. Pt. 2 was a 58-year-old man who had fever and shivering, and had developed jaundice after a fishing-trip to Canada. Pt. 3 was a 66-year-old woman who presented at the Emergency Unit with recently developed jaundice and pain in the right lateral epigastric area. INVESTIGATIONS: Laboratory results showed elevated levels for bilirubin, CK, BUN, creatinine and low thrombocytes in patients 1 and 2. An elevated lipase level was found in Pt 1, while Pt 3 had an elevated bilirubin and thrombocytopenia. In Pt 1 and 2 active leptospirosis was diagnosed by serological tests. The third patient showed a subsided leptospirosis, the jaundice having been due to a histologically confirmed drug-associated hepatitis. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Patients 1 and 2, who had active disease, showed the full-blown clinical picture of Weil's disease with jaundice, renal failure and thrombocytopenia. After administration of penicillin G and a third generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone), respectively, all symptoms disappeared. The 66-year-old woman (Pt 3) developed pneumonia and died of multiple organ failure. CONCLUSION: Leptospirosis is an important differential diagnosis in patients with recent onset of jaundice and acute renal failure. A detailed history may offer the crucial hint and serological tests provide proof. The clinical outcome mainly depends on starting antimicrobial therapy with penicillin G or a third generation cephalosporin as soon as practicable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".