New Directions in the History of Nursing: International perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Nursing History: International and Cultural Perspectives Susan McGann and Barbara Mortimer 2. Ethical Lives: Nursing (auto)Biographies and a History of Caring Julia Hallam 3. Bergljot Larsson, Founder and Leader of the Norwegian Nursing Association: A Case Study of the Influence of International Nursing Sigrun Hvalvik 4. Puerperal Fever as a Source of Conflict Between Midwives and Medical Men in Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Britain Christine Hallett 5. Re-examining the History of Nursing in Brazil Maria Lucia Mott 6. Sanba and their Clients: midwives and the medicalization of childbirth in Japan Aya Homei US Organized Medicine's Perspective of Nursing: a Review of JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) 1883-1953 Brigid Lusk and Julie Robertson 7. Race, Identity and the Nursing Profession in South Africa Helen Sweet and Anne Digby 8. Health Care and Nursing Co-ordination during the Nazi era in the Region of Osnabruck Mathilde Hackman 9. 'In England We Did Nursing': the Immigrant Experiences of Caribbean and British Nurses in Great Britain and Canada Margaret Shkimba and Karen Flynn 10. 'Beware of Worthless Imitations': Advertising in Nursing Periodicals, c.1888-1945 Elaine Thomson 11. Exploring the Maternity Archive of the Wellington St Helen's Hospital, New Zealand, 1907-1980 Pamela Wood and Maralyn Foureur 12. Postscript: Common Working Ground Joan Lynaugh
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".