MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W36894426 · doi:10.3168/jds.2022-22573

PERANCANGAN DAN PEMBUATAN ROBOT TARI PENDET KRSI 2010 (HARDWARE PENGGERAK LEHER, MATA, DAN PINGGUL)

2010· dissertation· en· W36894426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dunan Nurul Furqon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotentiometerMicrocontrollerRobotComputer scienceStepper motorDC motorSimulationMobile robotComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pendet robot is a human-shaped robot made for the final assignment. This robot is capable of doing the dance of Bali island that is home Pendet. Making Robots Pendet KRSI 2010 was conducted to where the right momentum for a national echo evoke the love and preservation of national culture. Robots designed to use DC motors as the driving, the minimum AT89S52 microcontroller as the control system, driver circuit and a position sensor (potentiometer). Programming language using the language C that serves as the driving robot program as a whole. Downloaded program on the minimum system that will read Microcontroller AT89S52 rotation angle changes potentiometer sensors on the neck, eyes and hips robot when the motor rotates to the left (CCW) and to the right (CW), then the sensor on the neck, eyes and hips, the robot will be information ADC value (poisi) on the potentiometer so that the microcontroller will command the motor driver to drive the DC motor in the neck, eyes and hips in accordance with the amount of value that you set up the ADC. Final project created to discuss matters pertaining to the hardware (electronic system) and the mechanics of the robot. KEYWORDS: Microcontroller AT89S52, DC Motors, Potentiometers, Driver, Language C, ADC, Electronics, Mechanics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207