Gender and path-shifting changes in a "hybrid" welfare regime: Argentina in comparative perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Melanoma is the most lethal of all skin cancers. This necessitates the need for a machine learning-driven skin cancer detection system to help medical professionals with early detection. We propose an integrated multi-modal ensemble framework that combines deep convolution neural representations with extracted lesion characteristics and patient meta-data. This study intends to integrate transfer-learned image features, global and local textural information, and patient data using a custom generator to diagnose skin cancer accurately. The architecture combines multiple models in a weighted ensemble strategy, which was trained and validated on specific and distinct datasets, namely, HAM10000, BCN20000 + MSK, and the ISIC2020 challenge datasets. They were evaluated on the mean values of precision, recall or sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy metrics. Sensitivity and specificity play a major role in diagnostics. The model achieved sensitivities of 94.15%, 86.69%, and 86.48% and specificity of 99.24%, 97.73%, and 98.51% for each dataset, respectively. Additionally, the accuracy on the malignant classes of the three datasets was 94%, 87.33%, and 89%, which is significantly higher than the physician recognition rate. The results demonstrate that our weighted voting integrated ensemble strategy outperforms existing models and could serve as an initial diagnostic tool for skin cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".