Suture bicuspidization repair for mild or moderate tricuspid regurgitation at the time of mitral valve surgery: success or bust?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de cet article est d’étudier la question du transcendantal et de l’idéalité chez Husserl et Derrida pour montrer les racines de la pensée derridienne sur l’Europe et en envisager une application possible à la question européenne. Il s’agit d’une analyse d’un texte non directement lié à l’Europe : l'Introduction à l’Origine de la Géométrie de Husserl de J. Derrida. L’Introduction est un texte fondamental pour la compréhension des rapports entre l’idéalité phénoménologique, la déconstruction et indirectement l’idée d’Europe. Si l’idée d’Europe est caractérisée, chez Husserl, par un processus d’idéalisation, il est nécessaire de prendre en considération ce texte de Husserl qui cherche à penser les conditions de possibilité de la transmission du sens idéal. Penser l’origine du sens et sa transmission revient à penser l’origine du projet rationnel qu’on appelle l’Europe, le statut de son identité, le concept de responsabilité qui lui est lié, sa structure temporelle et ses conditions de possibilité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".