Mobilisation des connaissances et développement social à Montréal : la lutte à la pauvreté au Plateau-Mont-Royal.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent Essai fait suite au volet stage du programme de maitrise en Pratiques de recherche et action publique (PRAP). Nous nous proposons ici surtout de réfléchir, à travers une étude cas, sur la mobilisation des connaissances, notamment la recherche et le transfert en \nmatière de lutte contre la pauvreté et l’exclusion sociale (LCPES) au Plateau-Mont-Royal, un des arrondissements de la Ville de Montréal. Sont aussi analysées les activités réalisées au cours du stage, ainsi que les activités de transfert. La réflexion sur cette mobilisation s’appuie pour l’essentiel sur nos connaissances de base, \nles enseignements du PRAP, les sources documentaires pertinentes ainsi que nos tâches complémentaires durant l’expérience. Ces dernières sont constituées pour l’essentiel d’une élaboration d’un Portrait pour l'intervention et de participation à des rencontres de discussions sur la LCPES. Les activités du stage, réalisées entre septembre 2009 et mars 2010, ont également favorisé \ndeux transferts de connaissances : vers le milieu d’action d’une part et vers le milieu scientifique d’autre part. \nDans le contexte de LCPES à l’échelon local, mais aussi aux niveaux provincial et canadien, la mobilisation des connaissances est très importante dans la mesure où elle conditionne une préparation, une mise en oeuvre et un suivi adéquats des politiques, programmes et projets. Notre étude a mis en relief un certain développement de la recherche portant sur la pauvreté et sur la LCPES. En revanche, il reste à mieux prendre appui sur les chercheurs et \nregroupements et surtout à développer le transfert et l’appropriation au bénéfice des milieux d’action publique locale. De telles stratégies devraient adéquatement prendre en considération d’importants éléments de contexte dont la multiplicité des découpages territoriaux, une culture \nde partenariat et de concertation ainsi que le dynamisme du mouvement communautaire autonome. Ces deux derniers facteurs notamment sont favorables à une stratégie spécifique de recherche partenariale This essay follows the internship part of the master’s program Pratiques de recherche et action publique (PRAP). Based on a case study, we discuss the mobilization of knowledge \nrelative to the fight against poverty and social exclusion (FAPSE) in Plateau-Mont-Royal, one of the autonomous boroughs of the City of Montreal. In this essay, we also analyze the activities accomplished throughout the internship and the transfer activities. The discussion on this mobilization is based mostly on our basic knowledge, on the teachings given throughout the PRAP program, on relevant documents and on our complementary tasks \nduring the internship. These tasks are the elaboration of a portrait for intervention and the participation to meetings on FAPSE. The activities completed during the internship, between September 2009 and March 2010, also made possible two transfers of knowledge : one towards the environment action and one towards the scientific community. \nIn the context of the FAPSE at the local, provincial and national level, the mobilization of knowledge is very important in so as far it conditions the adequate preparation, implementation and monitoring of the policies, programs and projects. Our study highlights a development of the research relating to poverty and to FAPSE. \nHowever, it is better to build on the researchers and groups and especially to develop the transfer and the appropriation of knowledge to the benefit of the local public action. Such strategies should adequately take into account important contextual elements, including the \nmultiplicity of territorial divisions, a culture of partnership and cooperation and the dynamism of \nthe community movement. These last two factors are particularly conducive to a specific strategy for research partnership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".