Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Chaque volume renfenne des cours ci-dessous: Bergson. Cours l, Edition par Henri Hude avec la collaboration de Jean-Louis Dumas, Paris, P.U.F.. collection « Epimethee », 1990. Lecons de psychologie a Clermont-Ferrand en 1887-1888. Lecons de metaphysique a Clermont-Ferrand en 1887-1888. Cours II. 1992. Introduction generale du cours de philosophie a Clermont-Ferrand en 1887-1888. Lecons d'esthetique a Clermont-Ferrand en 1887-1888. Lecons de morale au lycee Henri-IV en 1891-1893. Lecons de psychologie au Lycee Henri-IV en 1892-1893. Lecons de metaphysique (espâce, temps, matiere) au Lycee Henri-IV en 1892-1893. Cours III, 1995. Quelques lecons complementaires de philosdphie et d'histoire de la philosophie a ClermontFerrand en 1884-188-5. Lecons d'histoire de la philosophie moderne et contemporaine au Lycee Henri-IV en 18931894. Lecons sur la Critique di! la raison pure au Lycee Henri-IV en 1893-1894. Lecons sur les theories de l'âme au Lycee Henri-IV en 1894. Cours IV. 2000. Cours sur Plotin a l'Ecole normale superieure en 1898-1899. Cours d'histoire de la philosophie grecque au Lycee Henri-IV en 1894-1895. Lecons sur l'ecole d'Alexandrie a Clermont-Ferrand en 1884. Cours d'histoire de la philosophie grecque a l'Universite de Clermont-Ferrand en 1884-1885. 2 Jean Bardy, Bergson professeur. Au lysee di! Clermont-Ferrand. Cours 1885-1886, Paris-Montreal, L'Harmattan, 1998. Lecons clermontoises 1. Texte etabli, presente et annote par R. Ragghianti, L'Harmattan, 2003. 3 Je remercie Mme Annie Neuburger, petite-mece du philosophe, sa digne heritiere; Mmes Prevot et Fournier ainsi que M. Yves Peyre, Directeur de la Bibliotheque, de leur soutien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".