Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contents: Foreword Martin Scheinin 1. Introduction David Cole, Federico Fabbrini and Arianna Vedaschi PART I: SECRECY AND COURTS 2. Terrorism and Security: Back to the Future? Lord Justice Stephen Sedley 3. Oversight of National Security Secrecy in the United States Stephen Schulhofer 4. Secrecy vs. Openness: Counterterrorism and the Role of the German Federal Constitutional Court Mindia Vashakmadze 5. Formalism and State Secrets Sudha Setty PART II: SECRECY AND LEGISLATURES 6. Direct and Indirect Access to Intelligence Information: Lessons in Legislative Oversight from the United States and Canada Kathleen Clark and Nino Lomjaria 7. Arcana Imperii and Salus Rei Publicae: State Secrets Privilege and the Italian Legal Framework Arianna Vedaschi PART III: SECRECY AND DETENTION 8. Managing Secrecy and its Migration in a Post-9/11 World Kent Roach 9. National Security, Secret Evidence and Preventive Detentions: the Israeli Supreme Court as a Case Study Shiri Krebs 10. Secrecy and Control Orders: The Role an Vulnerability of Constitutional Values in the United Kingdom and Australia Andrew Lynch, Tamara Tulich and Rebecca Welsh 11. Comparative Advantages: Secret Evidence and 'Cleared Counsel' in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada David Cole and Stephen Vladek PART IV: SECRECY AND CRIMINAL TRIALS 12. The Normalization of Anonymous Testimony Jason Mazzone and Tobias Fisher 13. Terrorists on Trial: an Open or Closed Case? Clive Walker 14. In/Visible Courts: Military Tribunals as Other Spaces Ori Aronson PART V: SECRECY AND ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES 15. Administrative Counter-Terrorism - A Strategy to Circumvent Human Rights in the Fight Against Terrorism Tuomas Ojanen 16. Secret Evidence in EU Security Law: Special Advocates before the Court of Justice? Cian C. Murphy 17. Global Sanctions, State Secrets and Supranational Review: Seeking Due Process in an Interconnected World Federico Fabbrini 18. Secrecy Regulation by the European Union Inside Out Deirdre Curtin 19. Concluding Remarks Lech Garlicki
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.053 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it