MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W37596324 · doi:10.4337/9781781953860

Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law

2013· book· en· W37596324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2013
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw, Rights, and Freedoms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecrecyLawTerrorismPolitical scienceNational securityLegislature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Foreword Martin Scheinin 1. Introduction David Cole, Federico Fabbrini and Arianna Vedaschi PART I: SECRECY AND COURTS 2. Terrorism and Security: Back to the Future? Lord Justice Stephen Sedley 3. Oversight of National Security Secrecy in the United States Stephen Schulhofer 4. Secrecy vs. Openness: Counterterrorism and the Role of the German Federal Constitutional Court Mindia Vashakmadze 5. Formalism and State Secrets Sudha Setty PART II: SECRECY AND LEGISLATURES 6. Direct and Indirect Access to Intelligence Information: Lessons in Legislative Oversight from the United States and Canada Kathleen Clark and Nino Lomjaria 7. Arcana Imperii and Salus Rei Publicae: State Secrets Privilege and the Italian Legal Framework Arianna Vedaschi PART III: SECRECY AND DETENTION 8. Managing Secrecy and its Migration in a Post-9/11 World Kent Roach 9. National Security, Secret Evidence and Preventive Detentions: the Israeli Supreme Court as a Case Study Shiri Krebs 10. Secrecy and Control Orders: The Role an Vulnerability of Constitutional Values in the United Kingdom and Australia Andrew Lynch, Tamara Tulich and Rebecca Welsh 11. Comparative Advantages: Secret Evidence and 'Cleared Counsel' in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada David Cole and Stephen Vladek PART IV: SECRECY AND CRIMINAL TRIALS 12. The Normalization of Anonymous Testimony Jason Mazzone and Tobias Fisher 13. Terrorists on Trial: an Open or Closed Case? Clive Walker 14. In/Visible Courts: Military Tribunals as Other Spaces Ori Aronson PART V: SECRECY AND ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURES 15. Administrative Counter-Terrorism - A Strategy to Circumvent Human Rights in the Fight Against Terrorism Tuomas Ojanen 16. Secret Evidence in EU Security Law: Special Advocates before the Court of Justice? Cian C. Murphy 17. Global Sanctions, State Secrets and Supranational Review: Seeking Due Process in an Interconnected World Federico Fabbrini 18. Secrecy Regulation by the European Union Inside Out Deirdre Curtin 19. Concluding Remarks Lech Garlicki

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.015
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooksSame topicLaw, Rights, and FreedomsFrench-language works237,207