MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The School in the Mid-1930s

2011· book-chapter· en· W376157594 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Howson

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGerman Social Sciences and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabilitationSalaryNazismGraduation (instrument)PoliticsClassicsSociologyArt historyPolitical scienceLawHumanitiesArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The LSE Michaelmas term 1933 began on 9 October. On 11 October the Academic Freedom Committee met again. Robbins reported upon the cases he had investigated since the spring. The committee decided to make grants to assist five people – Adolf Löwe, Werner Friedrich Bruck, Charlotte Leubuscher, Eugen Fink and Robert René Kuczynski – and to use the balance of the fund for two fellowships for young scholars to continue their studies. For Löwe, Professor of Political Economy at the University of Frankfurt since 1931, who already had a temporary position at the University of Manchester, the committee offered to finance a course of lectures by him at LSE. For Bruck, dismissed from his professorship of economics at the University of Münster, the committee agreed to pay £100 to University College Cardiff to help with his removal expenses and salary as a visiting professor. It awarded £100 to Leubuscher of the Friedrich Wilhems University of Berlin to enable her to spend the academic year at Girton College Cambridge. Lionel had heard of the predicament of Fink, the research assistant and collaborator of the retired professor of philosophy at Freiburg Edmund Husserl, from Felix Kaufmann, a young Viennese philosopher who was a friend of Haberler and Tugendhat: Kaufmann had studied under Husserl and had read Fink’s work (Fink 1995, xxi, lxxxi). Fink was not Jewish but by staying with Husserl who was, he could not complete his Habilitation under Husserl’s successor, the Nazi Martin Heidegger, thus depriving himself of an academic career – and of a living if the grant which supported him was not renewed (Bruzina 2004, 27–8, 36–44). The committee decided to offer him a grant of £100 but on 15 December Lionel reported that Fink had received assistance from another source. Kuczynski, who had been the Director of the Statistical Office of the City of Berlin in the 1920s and more recently at the Brookings Institution, came to the School as an assistant to the Professor of Social Biology Lancelot Hogben; the fund contributed £200 towards his salary. He was appointed Reader in Demography five years later.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicGerman Social Sciences and HistoryFrench-language works237,207