Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a film review of The Amina Profile (2014) directed by Sophie Deraspe. Author Notes Rubina (Ruby) Ramji is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Cape Breton University. After serving as a Chair of the Religion, Film and Visual Culture Group for the American Academy of Religion and then on the steering committee, Rubina continues to serve on the Executive Committee for the Canadian Society for the Study of Religion as President and is the Film Editor of the Journal of Religion and Film. Her research activities focus on the areas of religion, media and identity, religion in Canada, and religion and immigration. This sundance film festival review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol19/iss1/30 The Amina Profile (2014) Directed by Sophie Deraspe The Amina Profile is a documentary film about an online relationship that blossoms in the midst of a revolution taking place in Syria. Amina Arraf is a Syrian-American and Sandra Bagaria is a Montrealer (Canada) who begin a sexual relationship online that evolves into one encapsulated by uprising, death threats and missing persons. Amina lives in Syria where homosexuality is banned, and she gains international recognition by creating an online blog entitled A Gay Girl in Damascus and providing a voice to an underrepresented and persecuted identity group in the Arab world. Sandra and Amina’s relationship becomes more and more intimate over a six month period so when Amina is abducted, Sandra sets out to find out the fate of her online lover. The documentary interviews people who were affected by Amina, and who searched for her. In the 1 Ramji: The Amina Profile Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2015 end, the truth is sadder than expected; Amina is not in prison, she is instead an online persona of Tom McMasters, a graduate student from America – a heterosexual male who decided to create a persona of a lesbian Middle Eastern woman struggling for independence amidst a social and religious revolution. Sandra Bagaria, in an interview with Emily Yoshida for The Verge explained why the Western world was so enthralled with the story of Amina; her story shows “us our weaknesses for cliche. The media, myself, and other people were fooled because it was such a perfect formula. We were like, ‘Oh, this seems beautiful, let's follow this story.’ It's really about how we in Western countries perceive the Middle East, and stereotypes that we all have that we should totally revise.” In a way, Tom McMasters provided a heroic and rebellious voice for the many people who were suffering under the Syrian regime: a strong voice for women told to remain silent, a fighting voice for gays and lesbians struggling to stay out of jail because of religious intolerance and a tiny but significant voice for Syrian youth fighting for freedom. But McMasters created a fantasy, a wish for something to hold on to during a revolution that tarnished the struggle in some ways, and broke the hearts of many who stood behind Amina Arraf. Not only did McMasters belittle the Arab Spring taking place in Syria, but his actions call into question the ethics of his behavior – both online and offline. The anonymity provided through social media has also changed the way we interact with other individuals, and the construction of identities needs to be better examined: are our identities more real because of our bodies or are we more free to be ourselves online, unencumbered by sexuality, gender and religious ideology? 2 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 19 [2015], Iss. 1, Art. 30 http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol19/iss1/30 3 Ramji: The Amina Profile Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.385 | 0.185 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".