Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Background and Purpose:</b> The purpose of this qualitative study was to evaluate experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic on freshman and sophomore residential nursing students in relation to personal development. Findings are examined through the lens of Chickering's seven vectors of psychosocial development to better understand the implications of nursing students' challenges during COVID-19. <b>Methods:</b> A convenience sample of residential nursing students completed surveys eliciting narrative descriptions of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on their lives while in college. <b>Results:</b> Five main themes were identified as personal consequences of the pandemic: loss of connection with peers and instructors, loss of focus, loss of motivation, physical isolation, and emotional isolation. Findings were discussed through the lens of Chickering's seven vectors of psychosocial development to better understand the implications of students' COVID experiences. <b>Implications for Practice:</b> The results of the study suggest that students may have experienced obstacles from the effects of COVID-19, which may affect their psychosocial and identity development. An understanding of the personal consequences of COVID-19 on residential nursing students may assist faculty and administrators as they develop opportunities for social interactions that serve as a foundation for psychosocial development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".