MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Withholding metformin prior to 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) oncology studies

2013· article· en· W37987902 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Eftekhari, David Manders, Tina Alden, Michael J. Lane, Don Wilson, R. Petter Tonseth, François Bénard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminMedicinePositron emission tomographyGrading (engineering)RegimenInternal medicineNuclear medicineColorectal cancerRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologyCancerInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

550 Objectives This prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was conducted to investigate the effects of witholding metformin on bowel 18F-FDG uptake in Type II diabetic patients. Methods 90 Type II diabetic patients on metformin therapy undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT for oncology participated in the study. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups: group A and B (n=30 each) were instructed to discontinue metformin 24h and 48h prior to the scan, respectively. Group C acting as controls continued regular metformin regimen (n=30). Two nuclear medicine physicians blindly assessed 18F-FDG uptake in the bowel with a visual grading system and semi-quantitatively with maximum bowel SUV. The fasting blood glucose levels were recorded by patients 3 days before the examination (baseline), and measured prior to the 18F-FDG injection. Results 18F-FDG uptake was lower in the small bowel of patient in groups A and B compared to the group C controls (p Conclusions Our study confirms increased uptake of 18F-FDG in the colon and to a lesser extent the small bowel in patients taking metformin. Withholding metformin 48 hours prior to 18F-FDG PET/CT can reduce uptake in the small bowel and colon, at the expense of a small increase in blood glucose levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207