Biblical Women in Early Modern Literary Culture 1550–1700
Bibliographic record
Abstract
comptes rendus 187 chorus, arguing that the second tragedy is the work of a more mature and original playwright.Mathilde Lamy-Houdry sketches out the conflict between epic poetry and tragedy in Jodelle's play through the lens of heroism.Aeneas is an epic hero who has found himself bewildered in the world of tragedy, Dido's universe.While Aeneas is confronted with a tragic dilemma-abandon the woman he loves or fulfil his epic mission-he does not hesitate the way the tragic hero would.He knows the choice he has to make: between his fear of Dido's suicide and his fear of divine vengeance, the latter operates more powerfully and determines his ultimate course of action.While as a tragic hero Dido is dominated by her passions and succumbs to them, Aeneas is able to move beyond the realm of emotions to base his decision on reason alone.This is a fine and varied collection of essays that anyone interested in Jodelle's second tragedy will no doubt find highly useful.anne g.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".