Retaining international students : identifying the needs of international students attending Memorial University of Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International students have many challenges to face when studying abroad. They have to be prepared to deal with cultural, academic, and social differences. When recruiting international students, Canadian universities need to be cognizant of these challenges and the needs of students. Institutions that are aware of the needs of international students can provide the appropriate programs and services and thus increase the universities’ abilities to retain them. -- This study assessed the pre-entry and entry needs of undergraduate and graduate international students who were first time entrants to Memorial University of Newfoundland during the fall semester of 1997 and the winter semester of 1998. The aim of this research was to identify the needs of international students and to make recommendations to Memorial University and more specifically, the Office of Student Affairs and Services as to how these needs could be met. -- The sixty-five item questionnaire collected information concerning needs in the following categories: academic, social/cultural, housing, finances, and recruitment and retention. The focus of this study was to explore the similarities and differences of the needs of undergraduate and graduate international students. -- A total of sixty-five questionnaires were available for data analysis. The most notable findings indicated that undergraduate and graduate international students have similar needs. Both groups would like to have information about Canada, and the university they will be attending before they leave to study abroad. Once they arrive in Canada, graduate students rely on their supervisors and respective faculties to assist in their adjustment to their new environment, whereas undergraduate international students tend to rely on friends and family for support and assistance. Other similar needs included (a) being met at the airport, (b) attending an orientation session, (c) participating in a peer-pairing program and a host family program, (d) assistance with locating accommodations, (e) assignment of an academic advisor, (0 academic assistance specifically with written and oral communication, (g) the lack of work opportunities on campus. The majority of students came to Memorial University because of recommendations from family and friends, and they believed that prospective international Memorial University students should be provided with information concerning the culture of Newfoundland, the university, and the weather conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".