MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W383260886

Repertoire from the Gillet-Fox Competition and its Importance to the Basoon Literature

2007· dissertation· en· W383260886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying-Ting Chiu

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Libraries (University of Maryland) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepertoireCompetition (biology)Computer scienceBiologyArtEcologyLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gillet-Fox International Competition, sponsored by the International Double Reed Society, is one of the most prestigious and renowned international competitions held for double reeds. The first competition was held in Lubbock, Texas, in 198 1 .Every year more than thirty competitors enter the preliminary round by sending their tapes. Up to five finalists are selected by the competition committee. The final round is judged in a public concert by a distinguished panel of judges from many countries. Former winners and finalists of the competition have enjoyed illustrious careers as world-class artists. Examples include David McGill, principal bassoon of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, who was a recipient of the 2001 Grammy Award for Best Instrumental Soloist; Ludovic Tissus who serves as second bassoon of the National Opera of Paris. The repertoire is chosen by a committee that ensures the pieces are highly challenging and have the qualities appropriate for an international competition. Each year of the competition the selected works represent a variety of stylistic genres, musical periods and nationalities, and include at least one major concerto, as well as a contemporary work. In choosing the works for this performance project, diversity was the aim in selecting works from the competition dating from 1994 to the present. The nationalities of the composers span several countries - Canada, France, USA, Australia, Sweden and Uruguay. Technically and stylistically, each work showcases particular challenges for the performer. Eight contemporary pieces were selected for this project. These pieces include single movements selected by the competition committee from works for bassoon and orchestra. In addition, my repertoire includes one work each from the Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, and Romantic periods. The Renaissance is represented by the first work from of a set of bassoon sonatas by Bertoli. The selected Baroque piece is Bach's Cello Suite No.2. This is the first transcription to be used in the competition. From the Classical period, I selected Sonata KV 292 for bassoon and cello. The edition for bassoon and piano was used here just as it was in the competition. Benvald's Concert Piece is a brilliant example of the technical and sentimental show pieces typical of the Romantic period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Libraries (University of Maryland)Same topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207