Социально-психологические контурыв исследовании гражданской компетентности
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of civic competence, which is examined through the four most important competencies such as environmental, economic, moral and legal. Each of them in their display forms is represented by four components such as motivational, cognitive, communicative and behavioral and in the structure of “Self-concept”. All components are integrated into the determined competencies and generally represent meaningful civic competence of personality.Civic competence is regarded as a level of maturity (ability, readiness), erudition and congruent proficiency of personality (skills and abilities) in implementation of civil and social life, when the deeds and actions, behavior and activities, even in nonprofessional fields, are carried out according to legal and moral norms, economic and ecological foundations of modern civil society.Emphasizing the level of social maturity, expertise, erudition and proficiency (skillfulness and dexterity) to provide congruent in different spheres of one’s own civil and social activity, in this definition we rely on the development of traits and qualities of the personality in:− Activity of the personality on the basis of communication, creativity, volitional acts, active life position of a person that is expressed in his ideological principles, consistency, advocating his views, the unity of word and deed.− Subjective importance of psychological knowledge, skills and abilities, attitudes that come from personal involvement in the case. Such knowledge and skills must be relevant, complicit.− Congruence of behavior and effective solving of the problems due to the penetration, concurrency, concordance but not internal adjacency, interpersonal sphere, communication, social activities, in standard or atypical situations.− Psychological position of a person as sustainable attitudes to others, to oneself, to the values and activities that are seen through the prism of significance of personal activity.− Selfdevelopment and selfimprovement that in the phenomenon of civic competence are manifested as a dynamic selfregulatory system that provides movement, selftransformation, and progressive development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".