A comparison between vertical winds in the lower thermosphere and magnetic field perturbations on the ground
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertical winds in the lower thermosphere are estimated from OI557.7-nm Doppler shifts obtained with a Fabry-Perot interferometer at the Poker Flat Research Range (65.12N, 147.43W in geographic coordinate), Alaska. The temporal variation of vertical winds was compared with the horizontal component of the magnetic field obtained at Poker Flat and two other sites, Gakona (62.12N, 145.14W) and Fort Yukon (66.36N, 145.22W). Two nights of observations were examined and the results were shown here. The results showed that temporal variations of vertical winds were similar to that of magnetic field variation during each substorm. In some cases the results of cross correlation between these two parameters showed that the magnetic field perturbation leads vertical winds in the earlier period of the substorm. The difference increased gradually and reached a maximum at around the center of the recovery phase. From there, the differences decreased. The mechanism for the relation between the two parameters is still unclear, but this result suggests an intimate relation between ionospheric currents and vertical wind in the thermosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".