MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trabajadores precarios, ¿ciudadanos precarios?

2007· article· en· W38642722 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luca Alteri, Luca Raffini

Bibliographic record

VenueSistema: Revista de ciencias sociales · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceCitizenshipApathyPoliticsPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolEste articulo analiza la relacion entre trabajo, identidad y ciudadania a traves de una investigacion empirica sobre jovenes italianos y immigrantes residentes en Italia. El objetivo es subrayar la relacion entre precariedad laboral y los riesgos de nuevas formas de marginalidad social y politica, que afectan a los jovenes socialmente mas debiles. Los resultados de la investigacion indican que el proceso de precarizacion del trabajo, cuando no esta ligado a una transformacion de las prestaciones sociales, se refleja en una crisis de integracion social, en el desarrollo de una actitud individualista y politicamente pasiva, en un socavamiento del sentido de pertenencia democratica. La precariedad labo- ral puede asi volverse en precariedad existencial y politica. EnglishFollowing the lines of a survey on young people both Italian and immigrated living in Italy, this article aims to stress the relationship among labour, identity and j citizenshiP. It points at the risk of job insecurity as a pre-condition of social and political marginali- zation, especially for young people suffering social weakness. As a result, the loss of job security provokes social integration crisis, development of selfish attitudes, mercase of political apathy, lack of interest for the engagement in a democratic community. This happens because of the objective changes in work practice which make old models of wage labour no longer generally applicable to traditional schemes: today, the question invol- ved how job insecurity moves from labour-market to the inner individual existence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSistema: Revista de ciencias socialesSame topicEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesFrench-language works237,207