MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of zoledronic acid (Z) treatment based on serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in patients (pts) with malignant bone disease

2006· article· en· W38662536 on OpenAlexaff
Alfredo Berruti, Luigi Dogliotti, Marco Tampellini, Allan Lipton, Vera Hirsh, Fred Saad, P. Liati, N. Shirina, Richard J. Cook, Yong-Jiang Hei

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineProstate cancerZoledronic acidParathyroid hormoneRelative riskUrologyPlaceboGastroenterologyCancerConfidence intervalEndocrinologyPathologyCalcium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8610 Background: Z prevents skeletal-related events (SREs) in pts with bone metastases or multiple myeloma. However, secondary hyperparathyroidism and increased PTH may stimulate osteoclast activity and tumor growth, thus potentially limiting the efficacy of Z. Methods: Serum PTH was assessed at baseline and every 3 months in 1,068 pts enrolled in 3 randomized trials: 547 received Z, and 521 received placebo or pamidronate. Results: 213 (20%) pts had elevated PTH at baseline, and 105 of 547 (19%) pts had elevated PTH during Z treatment. In patients with normal baseline PTH, Z significantly reduced the incidence of SREs and delayed time to first SRE compared with control, whereas the risk of SREs was not reduced in patients with elevated baseline PTH. In prostate cancer patients, Z significantly decreased the risk of death compared with placebo in pts with normal baseline PTH (relative risk [RR] = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 0.94; P = .015). No survival advantage was observed in this subpopulation among pts with lung cancer or other solid tumors. In the small subset of pts with elevated PTH during Z treatment, there was an increased risk of death (for breast cancer pts, RR = 1.68 [95% CI: 1.10, 2.56]; P = .016; for prostate cancer pts, RR = 2.92 [95% CI: 1.83, 4.67]; P < .001). Additionally, elevated PTH during Z treatment in prostate cancer pts also significantly correlated with an increased risk of bone lesion progression (RR = 1.54 [95% CI: 1.09, 2.17]; P = .015). Elevated PTH during treatment did not affect the incidence or time to onset of SREs. Among pts with lung cancer or other solid tumors, elevated PTH during Z treatment did not provide any predictive or prognostic information. Conclusions: PTH levels either at baseline or during Z treatment appear to correlate with disease progression and the clinical benefit of Z in pts with bone metastases from certain types of cancer. This retrospective analysis suggests the importance of PTH status in patients undergoing Z treatment. Normalization of PTH levels may increase the benefit of Z. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207