MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The role of image and reputation as intangible resources in non-profit organisations: a relationship management perspective

2010· article· en· W38861909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Identity and Reputation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndependent University, BangladeshUniversidade Estadual PaulistaTshwane University of TechnologyUppsala UniversitetUniversity of JohannesburgUniversidad de Buenos AiresUniversity of GalwayInyuvesi Yakwazulu-NataliCape Peninsula University of TechnologyHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityLappeenranta University of TechnologyZayed UniversityUniversidad Católica del NorteUniversity of the Western CapeUniversity of Technology SydneyOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiCranfield UniversityUniversity of LimerickInternational Business Machines CorporationHøgskolen i HedmarkLiverpool Hope UniversityLoughborough UniversityUlster UniversityRowan UniversityBournemouth UniversitySyracuse UniversityLebanese American UniversityUniversidade de CoimbraUniversity of TorontoUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaUniversity of WolverhamptonAmerican University of BeirutUniversity of Portsmouth
KeywordsReputationBusinessProfit (economics)MarketingCompetitive advantageResource-based viewKnowledge managementEconomicsMicroeconomicsSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Applying the latest ILAE epilepsy classification systems allow comparison across settings and identifies a major neuro-developmental co-morbidity rate and a large genetic aetiology. We identified very few meaningful molecular-based disease modifying "precision therapies". There is a monumental gap between aetiological identification, and impact of meaningful therapies, thus the new 2017/2022 classification clearly identifies the major challenges in the provision of routine epilepsy care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCorporate Identity and ReputationFrench-language works237,207