La evolución de los derechos de la Infancia: una visión Internacional internacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolA lo largo del Siglo XX se aprecia un proceso de internacionalizacion de los derechos de la infancia a partir, entre otros acontecimientos, de la celebracion de Congresos Internacionales que dieron lugar a un intercambio de experiencias y de politicas de proteccion comunes entre algunos paises de Europa y America; ademas del surgimiento y aplicacion de politicas protectoras a nivel nacional. Asimismo, y a partir de la promulgacion de tres importantes tratados internacionales en 1924, 1959 y 1989, esas politicas se expanden, siendo utilizadas como modelo por parte de paises que las iran implementando paulatinamente. No obstante, se puede constatar que el discurso sobre la infancia en ese periodo se mantiene permanente, destacando los derechos de autonomia y, sobre todo, los de proteccion y ayuda a los ninos y ninas en situaciones de exclusion social. EnglishDuring the 20th century a process of internationalisation concerning children’s rights has been operationalaized via, among other events, International Congresses held to exchange experiences and common protection policies between some European and American countries; and the emergence and application of national protection policies. In addition, working from the promulgation of three important international treaties in 1924, 1959 and 1989, these policies have expanded and are being used as a model by countries that are implementing them progressively. However, it can be proven that discourse on childhood in this period has been continuous, highlighting the rights to autonomy and above all those regarding protection andhelp for boys and girls in social exclusion situations. francaisTout au long du XXe siecle on observe un processus d’internationalisation des droits de l’enfance a partir, entre autres, de la celebration de Congres Internationaux qui ont donne lieu a une echange d’experiences et de politiques de protection communes entre certains pays d’Europe et d’Amerique ; a ceci il faut ajouter l’apparition et la mise en marche de politiques protectrices au niveau national. Aussi, et a partir de la promulgation de trois traites internationaux de grande importance, en 1924, 1959 et 1989, ces politiques se repandent et sont utilisees comme modele par des pays qui les mettront en oeuvre au fur et a mesure. Cependant, on remarque que le discours sur l’enfance en cette periode persiste, l’accent etant mis sur les droits d’autonomie et surtout ceux de protection et d’aide aux enfants dans des situations d’exclusion sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".