MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W39131451 · doi:10.7202/706220ar

Comparison of methods to detect resistance of Helminthosporium solani to a thiabendazole fungicide

2005· article· en· W39131451 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Janet Saunders, Deena Errampalli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsFungicideBiologyPolymerase chain reactionAlternaria solaniPathogenRhizoctonia solaniBenzimidazoleHorticultureVeterinary medicineMicrobiologyChemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of resistance to a post-harvest and preplanting benzimidazole fungicide, thiabendazole (TBZ), has resulted in the increase of silver scurf of potato caused by Helminthosporium solani . Conventional and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays were compared, among 54 isolates of H. solani , to detect the TBZ-sensitive (TBZ S ) and -resistant (TBZ R ) isolates. In a PCR-based assay, all 27 single-spore isolates from eastern Canada, nine isolates from Alberta in western Canada, six isolates from North Dakota, USA were distinguished as TBZ R , the remainder of the isolates being determined as TBZ S . The results from the PCR-based assay correlated well with the TBZ sensitivity assessment of isolates of H. solani on the TBZ-amended medium. Also, the detection of TBZ R - H. solani in 20 tuber samples with silver scurf lesions by the PCR-based assay demonstrates that this method can be used to detect the pathogen directly from the tuber lesions. The PCR-based method was more rapid (1 day) than the conventional technique (5 weeks).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207