ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT AND SELF-HANDICAPPING IN AUSTRALIAN AND CANADIAN HIGH SCHOOLS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. Research investigating the relationship between classroom environment and self-handicapping was conducted in Australian and Canadian high schools. A sample of 2,006 students responded to a questionnaire that assessed student perceptions of classroom environment and self-handicapping. Simple and multiple correlational analyses showed that classroom environment accounted for small but significant proportions of variance in self-handicapping. Enhanced affective dimensions of the classroom environment were associated with reduced levels of self-handicapping. For Australian and Canadian students the relationship between each classroom environment scale and self-handicapping was very similar. There were no significant gender differences in the relationship between each classroom environment scale and self-handicapping. A commonality analysis revealed that conventional rather than constructivist classroom environment dimensions accounted for most of the variance in self-handicapping. LIENS EXISTANT ENTRE LA PERCEPTION QU'ONT LES ETUDIANTS DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT D'UNE SALLE DE CLASSE DE MATHEMATIQUES ET LE HANDICAP INTENTIONNEL DANS LES ECOLES SECONDAIRES CANADIENNES ET AUSTRALIENNES RESUME. Des recherches portant sur le lien entre l'environnement d'une salle de classe et le handicap intentionnel ont ete menees dans des ecoles secondaires australiennes et canadiennes. Un echantillon de 2 006 etudiants a repondu a un questionnaire visant a evaluer la perception par les etudiants de l'environnement d'une salle de classe et du handicap intentionnel. Des analyses correlationnelles simples et multiples ont demontre que l'environnement d'une salle de classe avait une incidence legere mais significative sur la variance du handicap intentionnel. Un lien a ete etabli entre l'accroissement de la dimension affective d'une salle de classe et la diminution du handicap intentionnel. Le lien etabli entre les proportions de la salle de classe et le handicap intentionnel chez les etudiants australiens etait tres semblable a celui present chez les etudiants canadiens. La difference de sexe n'influencait pas le lien entre l'environnement d'une salle de classe et le handicap intentionnel. Selon une analyse convergente, ce sont les dimensions traditionnelles plutot que constructivistes de l'environnement d'une salle de classe qui etaient responsables de la majeure partie de la variance du handicap intentionnel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".