Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare sex-based differences in the mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) response to limb and inspiratory metaboreflex activation, during relative and absolute workloads. Healthy males (<i>n</i> = 9) and females (<i>n</i> = 8) completed pulmonary function testing, forearm volume and circumference measurements, and bouts of limb and inspiratory muscle exercise. The exercises performed included bouts of rhythmic handgrip exercise (RHG) and inspiratory pressure threshold loading (PTL) to task failure, performed in a randomized order and separated by 30 minutes of rest. Participants performed both RHG and PTL at predetermined relative (R) and absolute (A) workloads, while cardiopulmonary measurements were recorded continuously. A time-dependent rise in MAP was observed in all participants, regardless of sex, muscle, or workload (<i>P</i> < 0.001). MAP was greater in males than females during all exercise bouts regardless of muscle group or workload (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The change in MAP from baseline was also greater in males (R-RHG: Δ31 ± 12 mmHg; R-PTL: Δ31 ± 9; A-RHG: Δ35 ± 6; and A-PTL: Δ30 ± 7) than females (R-RHG: Δ21 ± 7 mmHg; R-PTL: Δ13 ± 7; A-RHG: Δ21 ± 7; and A-PTL: Δ14 ± 3) (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Results from this study show that when the forearm and diaphragm perform the same relative or absolute work, the blood pressure response is statistically similar, and both responses are greater in males than females. The findings from the present study suggest that the sex-based difference in the response to metaboreflex activation is similar between the limb and respiratory musculature.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> With rhythmic handgrip exercise and inspiratory pressure threshold loading there was a time-dependent rise in the blood pressure that was significantly lower in females than males. The blunted blood pressure response in females was present whether handgrip or inspiratory workload was relative or absolute. An attenuated cardiovascular response to high levels of limb or respiratory muscle work may have implications for whole body exercise in health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".