Climate Change Visualization: Using 3D Imagery of Local Places to Build Capacity and Inform Policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to gather and summarize currently available product information on salt substitutes, low-sodium products, and medicinal potassium supplements. A review of the literature identified both risks (e.g., hyperkalemia) and benefits (e.g., changing sodium:potassium ratios, and low-cost substitutes for medicinal potassium replacement) resulting from the use of salt substitutes. Risks and benefits are related to individual patient conditions and treatment plans. Nutritionists and physicians must be aware of the medicinal and dietary potassium sources and be able to educate patients in the proper use of the products. Lists of medicinal and dietary sources of potassium are provided to aid health professionals in determining appropriate potassium equivalents. Case reports from the literature of patients developing hyperkalemia secondary to the use of salt substitutes are summarized. Regular monitoring of serum potassium levels is necessary to achieve and maintain normal values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".