MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W398429873

Canadian Community As Partner: Theory & Multidisciplinary Practice

2007· book· en· W398429873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ardene Robinson Vollman, Elizabeth T. Anderson, Judith McFarlane

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2007
Typebook
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPublic Health Policies and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth promotionPublic healthCommunity healthPublic relationsEmpowermentHealth policyHealth equityPopulation healthSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part I: THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS 1 Population Health Promotion: Essentials and Essence of Practice INTRODUCTION FOUNDATIONS OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE A FRAMEWORK FOR HEALTH PROMOTION IN CANADA GLOBAL CONFERENCES ON HEALTH PROMOTION 2 Ethics for Community Practice INTRODUCTION KEY CONCEPTS IN ETHICAL PRACTICE ETHICAL DIVERSITY UNDERPINS COMMUNITY PRACTICE 3 Epidemiology, Demography, and Community Health NTRODUCTION DEMOGRAPHY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY CONTEMPORARY COMMUNITY HEALTH PRACTICE 4 Creating Supportive Environments for Health: Social Network Analysis INTRODUCTION SUNDSVALL CONFERENCE AND STATEMENT 5 Developing Personal Skills: Empowerment INTRODUCTION PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT IN CONTEXT 6 Strengthening Community Action: Public Participation and Partnerships for Health INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7 Building Healthy Public Policy INTRODUCTION WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY? 8 Reorienting Health Services INTRODUCTION PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 9 Honouring Culture and Diversity in Community Practice INTRODUCTION THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF CANADA 10 Community Health Informatics INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH INFORMATICS 11 Emerging Threats to Community Health INTRODUCTION IDENTIFICATION OF EMERGING PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUES Part II: THE PROCESS OF COMMUNITY AS PARTNER 12 A Model to Guide Practice INTRODUCTION MODELS 13 Community Assessment INTRODUCTION THE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT TEAM 14 Community Analysis and Diagnosis INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ANALYSIS 15 Planning a Community Health Program INTRODUCTION PLANNING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY 16 Implementing a Community Health Program INTRODUCTION PROMOTING COMMUNITY OWNERSHIP 17 Evaluating a Community Health Program INTRODUCTION EVALUATION PRINCIPLES Part III: COMMUNITY AS PARTNER IN PRACTICE 18 Community Profile: Exemplar Health District INTRODUCTION DEMOGRAPHIC DATA 19 Assessing the Health of Communities in Northern Canada INTRODUCTION INUIT WOMEN'S HEALTH 20 Promoting the Health of Pregnant Women INTRODUCTION EMPOWERING IMMIGRANT WOMEN IN CANADA 21 Promoting the Health of School Children INTRODUCTION PROMOTING SCHOOL HEALTH THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP MODEL 22 Youth Engagement in Health Promotion INTRODUCTION WAY OUT THERE: YOUTH ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL POLICY ACTION PLANNING 23 Promoting Health in the Workplace INTRODUCTION RESPONSIVE WORKPLACE STRATEGIES FOR PANDEMIC INFLUENZA 24 Promoting the Health of Vulnerable Populations INTRODUCTION WORKING WITH VULNERABLE POPULATIONS IN URBAN SETTINGS 25 TELESENIOR: Videophone Nursing Care Project for Homebound Elderly INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND Appendix A: A Model Assessment Guide for Nursing in industry Appendix B: Assessment of an industry Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Theoretical or conceptuallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes
Theoretical or conceptualhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.434 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Entomology and ZoologySame topicPublic Health Policies and EducationFrench-language works237,207