MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W400082315

Country of Birth of Parents and Ethnic Origins-A Comparison of Reporting Patterns in the 2001 Census

2003· article· en· W400082315 on OpenAlex
John Kralt

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCensus and Population Estimation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusEthnic groupImmigrationEthnologyPlace of birthGeographyDemographyGenealogyHumanitiesSociologyHistoryPolitical sciencePopulationAnthropologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT/RESUME The 2001 Census of Canada has questions on the Country of Birth of Parents as well as the more traditional Origin. It has been suggested that, given the ambiguities in the ethnic origins data, they could be replaced by the country of birth of parents data. It is argued in this paper that such a decision would effectively create two classes of Canadians--True Canadians, who are primarily of Western European descent, and Immigrant Canadians, who are primarily from Southern Europe and the Third World. Specifically, the paper examines the historical continuity in the 1996--2001 ethnic origins data, the extent to which specific ethnic origins were reported by persons whose parents were born in Canada, the countries of birth of fathers and mothers, and the extent to which reported ethnic origins are associated with specific countries. Alternative data sources for some of the ethnic origins data from the Census are explored. The paper concludes with some of the ramifications for the Department of Canadian Heritage if country of birth of parents were to replace ethnic origin. Le recensement canadien de 2001 contient une question sur le pays de naissance des parents et une question plus traditionnelle sur l'origine ethnique. On a propose que, compte tenu de l'ambiguite des donnees sur l'origine ethnique, elles pourraient etre remplacees par les donnees sur le pays de naissance des parents. L'auteur de ce document soutient qu'une telle decision creerait en fait deux types de Canadiens : les vrais Canadiens, qui sont principalement originaires d'Europe occidentale, et les Canadiens immigrants, qui viennent surtout d'Europe du Sud et des pays du Tiers Monde. Plus precisement, le document examine la continuite historique des donnees sur l'origine ethnique entre 1996 et 2001, la mesure dans laquelle une origine ethnique precise a ete declaree par les personnes dont les parents sont nes au Canada, le pays de naissance du pere et de la mere et la mesure dans laquelle l'origine ethnique declaree est liee a un pays precis. D'autres sources de donnees sont suggerees pour les donnees sur l'origine ethnique tirees du recensement. Le document conclut en mentionnant certaines repercussions, pour le ministere du Patrimoine canadien, si la question sur le pays de naissance des parents devait remplacer la question sur l'origine ethnique. INTRODUCTION Immigration has been and continues to be a major component of the growth of the Canadian population. According to the 2001 Census, 2 in 5 Canadian residents aged 15 and above are either born outside Canada themselves, or one or both of their parents were born outside Canada. It is therefore not surprising that there is considerable interest in the immigrant component of the population, both among the general public and among those responsible for public policy. This interest is reflected in the Canadian census by the inclusion of questions on: - languages other than English and French; - ethnic origins and visible minority status; - country of birth of respondent and country of birth of each of the respondent's parents; - the year of first immigration; period of first immigration, and age at first immigration; - religion. This paper focuses on the Country of Birth of Parents data and their relationship to the Origin data. (1) Ethnic origin, and its predecessor, race or origin, has been asked in some form or other in every census since 1871. Up to and including the 1971 census, only one racial origin or ethnic origin was to be reported, and only one origin was retained for analysis, even if the respondent had more than one cultural or ethnic or racial origin. The criteria to force the reporting of only one origin gradually evolved to the reporting of only the origin of the paternal ancestor. In response to a need for data on Metis (an origin deemed to be impossible to trace using paternal ancestry as the paternal ancestor would be either Aboriginal or European), and to remove some of the known inconsistencies in the data, respondents were allowed to report more than one ethnic origin in 1981, a practice which has been continued in subsequent censuses. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.401
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it