MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40195367

Effect of Rotation Age on Lumber Grade Yield, Bending Strength and Stiffness in Jack Pine ( Pinus Banksiana Lamb.) Natural Stands

2006· article· en· W40195367 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWood and Fiber Science (Society of Wood Science and Technology) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFPInnovations
KeywordsPinus <genus>HorticultureAnimal scienceYield (engineering)MathematicsForestryProductivityGrading (engineering)BotanyComposite materialGeographyMaterials scienceBiologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of rotation age on lumber visual grade yield and lumber bending properties were studied on 142 jack pine trees sampled in three stands located in Timmins, Ontario.The stands, aged 50, 73, and 90 years were all naturally established after forest fires.The visual grading of a total of 1720 lumber pieces showed that the 50-yr-old stand produced a slightly lower Select Structural grade yield (36.1%) compared to the older stands (73 yr 42.9% and 90 yr 39.3%).When No. 2 and Better grades were combined, the 50-yr-old stand resulted in the lowest volume yield (88.2%), whereas the proportions of No.2 and Better for the 73-and 90-yr-old stands were comparable (93.0 and 92.6%, respectively).Downgrades due to decay were much higher in the 90-yr-old stand (20.6%) than in the 73-and 50-yr-old stands (5.2% and 0%, respectively).Regarding stand productivity, the 50-yr-old stand showed the highest annual stand increment of 5.25 m 3 /ha/year, compared to 3.82 and 3.21 for the 73-and 90-yr-old stands, respectively.The visual grading of 782 board pieces showed no effect of stand age on board quality.In the 90-yr-old trees, wood density decreased steadily from butt to top for all the diameter classes studied (12 -30 cm).The study showed that rotation age had a significant impact on lumber bending properties.The lumber bending properties for the 50-yr-old stand were significantly lower than those of the 73-and 90-yr-old stands.The lumber strength (MOR) and lumber stiffness (MOE) values for the 50-yr-old stand were about 16% lower and 19 -16% lower than those of the 73-and 90-yr-old stands, respectively.However, no significant differences in lumber bending properties were found between the two older stands.From the viewpoint of lumber properties, a moderate rotation age of about 70 years is preferred in jack pine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it