Advances in image acquisition and filtering for MRI neuroimaging at 7 tesla
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Performing magnetic resonance imaging at high magnetic field strength promises many improvements over low fields that are of direct benefit in functional neuroimaging. This includes the possibility of improved signal-to-noise levels, and increased BOLD functional contrast and spatial specificity. However, human MRI at 7T and above suffers from unique engineering challenges that limit the achievable gains. In this thesis, three technological developments are introduced, all of which address separate issues associated with functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging at very high magnetic field strengths.\nFirst, the image homogeneity problem is addressed by investigating methods of RF shimming — modifying the excitation portion of the MRI experiment for use with multi-channel RF coils. It is demonstrated that in 2D MRI experiments, shimming on a slice-by slice basis allows utilization of an extra degree of freedom available from the slice dimension, resulting in significant gains in image homogeneity and reduced RF power requirements.\nAfter acceptable images are available, we move to address complications of high field imaging that manifest in the fMRI time series. In the second paper, the increased physiological noise present in BOLD time series at high field is addressed with a unique data-driven noise regressor scheme based upon information in the phase component of the MRI signal. It is demonstrated that this method identifies and removes a significant portion of physiological signals, and performs as good or better than other popular data driven methods that use only the magnitude signal information.\nLastly, the BOLD phase signal is again leveraged to address the confounding role of veins in resting state BOLD fMRI experiments. The phase regressor technique (previously developed by Dr. Menon) is modified and applied to resting state fMRI to remove macro vascular contributions in the datasets, leading to changes in spatial extent and connectivity of common resting state networks on single subjects and at the group level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".