MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4051065 · doi:10.2105/ajph.75.11.1288

Maintenance of germ line and somatic DNA methylation during mouse development

2003· article· en· W4051065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bonnie Reinhart

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican journal of public health · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenomic imprintingDNA methylationBiologyImprinting (psychology)GeneticsMethylationRNA-Directed DNA MethylationTransgeneEpigeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA methylation in mammals is involved in several essential processes including X chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting, and host defense against mobile genetic elements. How methylation is targeted to specific sequences in the germ line and how specific methylation patterns are maintained during development is not fully understood. Genomic methylation is established in the gamete, decreases dramatically during preimplantation development, and is re-established after implantation of the blastocyst. However, the methylation present at imprinted loci is specifically maintained during preimplantation development. Imprinted genes are located in clusters, and within each gene cluster parent-of-origin specific expression is governed by an imprinting center (IC). The ICs of the maternally imprinted murine Snrpn, Kcnq1, and Igf2r gene clusters coincide with their differentially methylated domains (DMDs). We have shown that specific DMD sequences are required to establish differential methylation at an imprinted locus. Hybrid transgenes were generated using a non-imprinted derivative of the imprinted RSVIgmyc mouse transgene, Ig/myc, and sequences from endogenous imprinted gene DMDs. Addition of specific DMD sequences to the Ig/myc transgene restored its imprinting. Only the tandem repeats found within the Snrpn, Kcnq1, and Igf2r DMDs were capable of establishing maternal-specific transgene methylation. These experiments have also shown that the methylation on imprinted gene DMD sequences is specifically maintained during the early stages of preimplantation development. These results clearly demonstrate the importance of tandem repeats in the process of genomic imprinting. DNA methylation is also critical for silencing intracisternal A particle (IAP) transposition within the genome. It is thought that maintenance of IAP element methylation during preimplantation is critical to repress IAP element transcription and transposition. The methylation of IAP element long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences was analyzed at the blastocyst stage of preimplantation development using the bisulfite genomic sequencing technique. These experiments have shown that methylation is maintained on the majority of IAP elements at the blastocyst stage of preimplantation development. However, the methylation on specific IAP elements is completely lost at this time, including the methylation of single IAP element LTRs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican journal of public healthSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207