MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40562210

Taphonomy of horned dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae) from the late Campanian Kaiparowits Formation, Grand Staircase - Escalante National Monument, Utah

2010· book-chapter· en· W40562210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Getty, Mark A. Loewen, Eric M. Roberts, Alan L. Titus, Scott D. Sampson

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaphonomyGeologyNational monumentCretaceousPaleontologyFluvialArchaeologyStructural basinGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Extract] A collaborative palaeontologicsl survey conducted by the Utah Museum of Natural History and the Bureau of Land Management in the Upper Cretaceous Kaiparowits Formation, in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, southern Utah, has yielded remains of at least three new ceratopsid dinosaur taxa from multiple localities. Significant ceratopsid specimens excavated and collected from these localities provide the basis of a taphonomic study of ceratopsian deposition in the Kaiparowits Formation. Most ceratopsian remains in the formation represent isolated specimens preserved by rapid burial within fluvial channels and are likely to be preserved as associated or partially articulated specimens. Rare specimens preserved in fine-grained overbank or pond sediments are much more likely to be disarticulated and decomposed than those in fluvial channel settings. The Kaiparowits Formation preserves no evidence of mass monodominant centrosaurine bonebeds like those found in the coeval Dinosaur Park and Two Medicine Formations; however, a single monodominant chasmosaurine bonebed at UMNH locality 942 may be due to behavioral or paleoenvironmental influences, and may represent a link with other Campanian chasmosaurine localities in the southern Western Interior Basin. Trends in taphonomic modes and signatures from ceratopsian localities in the Kaiparowits Formation provide useful means of comparing preservation of these taxa with others found in coeval formations in Alberta and Montana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207