MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W40968402 · doi:10.17742/image.crypt.2-1.8

ON HAMLET’S CRYPT: EFFI BRIEST, ASTA NIELSEN, AND BRITNEY SPEARS

2011· article· en· W40968402 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Viola Kolarov

Bibliographic record

VenueImaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstinctHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This contribution looks at the way instinct is transmittedand represented as ghost appearance. The essay elaboratestwo basic theses: first, that instinct is not definedby creaturely heritage, since it is not a testable structurein itself, nor subject to mourning and developmentalprocesses; and second, that works of fine literature andpop oeuvres alike may serve as carriers of a ghost transmissioncharged with instinctive heritage. The studyrepresents a model for reading ghostly genealogies thatcomplement the familiar and familial reproductive onesas it draws on traditions such as the adultery novel, continentalphilosophy, psychoanalysis, and Disney.Currently based in Berlin, Viola Kolarov has taught inthe German Departments of the Johns Hopkins Universityand New York University. She has published onShakespeare, contemporary art, film, and pop culture.Her forthcoming book, “Shakespeare and the Autobiographyof the Machine Age,” rethinks Goethe, theGerman translation/transmission of Shakespeare, andthe German literary tradition in the contexts of mediatechnology.Originally from Berlin, Susanne Lanckowsky enteredthe Academy of Fine Arts Karlsruhe, class of Franz Ackermann,in 2007. Since 2009 she has shown solo and ingroup on numerous occasions and studied abroad withprestigious scholarship support for one semester at theFaculdade de Belas Artes Universidade do Porto, Portugal,and for another semester at the Escuela Nacional dePintura, Escultura y Grabado La Esmeralda in Mexico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image StudiesSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207