Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The Sensual Middle Ages Richard Newhauser (Arizona State University, USA) 1. The Social Life of the Senses: Experiencing the Self, Others, and Environments Chris Woolgar (University of Southampton, UK) 2. Urban Sensations: The Medieval City Imagined Kathryn Reyerson (University of Minnesota, USA) 3. The Senses in the Marketplace: Markets, Shops, and Shopping in Medieval Towns Martha Carlin (University of Wisconsin, USA) 4. The Senses in Religion: Liturgy, Devotion, and Deprivation Beatrice Caseau (University of Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV), France) 5. The Senses in Philosophy and Science: Mechanics of the Body or Activity of the Soul? Pekka Karkkainen (University of Helsinki, Finland) 6. Medicine and the Senses: Feeling the Pulse, Smelling the Plague, and Listening for the Cure Faith Wallis (McGill University, Canada) 7. The Senses in Literature: The Textures of Perception Vincent Gillespie (University of Oxford, UK) 8. Art and the Senses: Art and Liturgy in the Middle Ages Eric Palazzo (University of Poitiers, France) 9. Sensory Media: From Sounds to Silence, Sight to Insight Hildegard Elisabeth Keller (Indiana University, USA and University of Zurich, Switzerland) Notes Bibliography Notes on contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it