MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W41313103 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.022801

Structure of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>and the thermonuclear<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>(<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>reaction rate

2010· article· lv· W41313103 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Setoodehnia, A. A. Chen, Jun Chen, Jason A. Clark, C. M. Deibel, Scott Geraedts, D. Kahl, P. D. Parker, D. Seiler, C. Wrede

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2010
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsProtonResonance (particle physics)Type (biology)Atomic physicsCrystallographyNuclear physicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structure of proton unbound $^{30}\mathrm{S}$ states is important for determining the $^{29}\mathrm{P}$($p,\ensuremath{\gamma}$)$^{30}\mathrm{S}$ reaction rate, which influences explosive hydrogen burning in classical novae and type I x-ray bursts. The reaction rate in this temperature regime had been previously predicted to be dominated by two low-lying, unobserved, ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}=$ ${3}^{+}$ and ${2}^{+}$ resonances above the proton threshold in $^{30}\mathrm{S}$. To search for these levels, the structure of $^{30}\mathrm{S}$ was studied using the $^{32}\mathrm{S}$($p,t$)$^{30}\mathrm{S}$ transfer reaction with a magnetic spectrograph. We have confirmed a previous detection of a state near 4700 keV, which had tentatively been assigned ${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={3}^{+}$. We have also discovered a new state at 4814(3) keV, which is a strong candidate for the other important resonance (${J}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={2}^{+}$). The new $^{29}\mathrm{P}$($p,\ensuremath{\gamma}$)$^{30}\mathrm{S}$ reaction rate is up to 4--20 times larger than previously determined rates over the relevant temperature range. The uncertainty in the reaction rate due to uncertainties in the resonance energies has been significantly reduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.015
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0130.014
Scholarly communication0.0130.014
Open science0.0170.019
Research integrity0.0150.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1760.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207