Readmission for small-bowel obstruction in the early postoperative period: etiology and outcome.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of readmission for early postoperative small-bowel obstruction (SBO), to highlight factors that may predispose to this condition, to define the risks of strangulation and to compare the immediate and long-term risks and benefits of operative versus nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: A chart review. SETTING: The Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Montreal. PATIENTS: Out of a total of 1001 cases of SBO in 552 patients, 30 patients were readmitted within 50 days of a previous laparotomy with the diagnosis of SBO. INTERVENTION: Selective nonoperative management and exploratory laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The value of nonoperative management and need for operation. RESULTS: Adhesions were the cause of the obstruction in most cases (24); other causes were Crohn's disease (2), hernia (1), malignant neoplasm (1) and a combination of adhesions and malignant disease (2). Thirteen (43%) of the procedures preceding the obstruction were primary small-bowel operations. There was only 1 episode of strangulated bowel. Of the patients readmitted for SBO, 7 (23%) were treated operatively with a long-term recurrence rate of 57% compared with 63% for those treated nonoperatively for the SBO. The median time to recurrence was 0.1 years (range from 0.02-6 yr) for those whose SBO was managed operatively, compared with 0.7 years (range from 0.08-5 yr) for those managed nonoperatively for the SBO. The median length of stay for patients managed operatively for SBO was 12 days (range from 9-17 d) compared with 6 days (range from 2-33 d) for those managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission for SBO within 50 days of a previous laparotomy represents a small percentage of all cases of SBO. They frequently follow small-bowel operations. Cases of strangulation are no more common than in general cases of SBO. Patients treated nonoperatively for SBO did not experience less favourable outcomes with respect to resolution of symptoms, length of stay, risk of recurrence and reoperation. Thus, operative intervention is not necessary in an otherwise stable patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".