Банки с иностранным участием в России: реакция на внешние угрозы
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present article studies entry stages of foreign credit institutions to the domestic banking market. The authors have determined time points at which the rate of non-resident expansion to authorized capital of commercial banks increases/decreases depending on the political and economic situation in Russia. Quantitative and qualitative indicators of foreign bank participation in joint authorized capital of the Russian banking system have been defined. The focus of attention is model banking business strategy in Russia by non-residents in the context of past economic and financial crises, as well as forms of interaction of foreign banks with their customer base. The article contains an assessment of the international financial market response to the economic sanctions imposed by the United States, Canada, Japan and Western Europe. Those sanctions gave rise to a policy of gradual access restriction of long-term and medium-term capital to markets for Russian banking structures. In conclusion the authors consider it possible to launch long-term processes of property redistribution in the Russian banking system in favor of residents and non-residents from Asian countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.028 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.015 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".