The decline of social education and the rise of instrumentalism in North American adult education (1947–1970)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1947 the Truman Commission on Higher Education accentuated the importance of adult education in its report entitled Higher Education for American Democracy. In 1970 a new US Handbook of Adult Education signifying the move to a more professionalised field of study and practice was published. The intervening years encapsulate a time of profound cultural changes marked by scientific and technological advances intertwined with Cold War adjustments and a pervasive politics of fear. In this period North American adult education became immersed in the discourse of democracy endorsing capitalism as it advanced middle-class economic and cultural values. In an analysis of the positions of dominant players in North American adult education (1947–1970), this article explores what emerged as a growing divide between the field's historical location as social education and its new location as an emerging professionalised modern practice steeped in instrumentalism. It considers what the field's historically diffuse nature meant to those in a growing professoriate as they deliberated whether adult education was a movement or a profession. The article also examines the cultural location of North American adult education and its evolving formation in academe as the educational enterprise reacted to the mushrooming of science and technology, the commodification of knowledge, and the cultural and political fear of communism. It reviews suggestions that mainstream adult educators had for enhancing the field of study and practice into the future. After turning to history to consider the nature of adult education, it ends by taking up a key question: Is adult education in crisis in the present? Here it takes up the significance of social policymaking as it discusses characteristics of critically progressive education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".