MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200008313 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ytnms

Analisis Video Comments To Followers Ratio Instagram Pada 5 Brand Asli Indonesia Yang Sudah Mendunia

2021· preprint· id· W4200008313 on OpenAlexaff
Ni Komang Arista Sriastiti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsBrandon Regional Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtAdvertisingBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Instagram merupakan media social berbasis foto dan video yang diluncurkan pada 6 Oktober 2010, setelah dirilis dalam sehari Instagram mendapatkan 25.00 pengguna, dan dalam sepuluh tahun kemudian, jumlah pengguna meningkan menjadi lebih dari satu miliar. Instagram adalah sebuah aplikasi media sosial yang memberikan cara cepat dan menyenangkan untuk berbagi media melalui konten platform tertentu, yaitu snap foto, memilih filter-filter untuk mengubah tampilan dan nuansa foto, serta dapat menambahkan komentar dalam posting foto tersebut. Dengan pengguna yang sangat luas membuat Instagram menjadi salah satu platform untuk media marketing bagi para pelaku usaha. Contohnya adapun 5 Brand Asli Indonesia yang Mendunia, diantaranya : Indomie, Polytron, La Fonte, Tolak Angin, Eiger yang menggunakan Instagram sebagai media promosi. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menghitung kredbilitas performa akun Instagram 5 Brand Asli Indonesia yang Mendunia. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode eksploratif kuantitatif. Hasil yang diproleh dari penelitian ini menentukan bahwa akun Instagram Polyton memiliki nilai kerdibilitas yang tinggi sehingga menempati pringkat pertama dari 5 Brand Asli Indonesia yang Mendunia dan memiliki performa akun yang baik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Methods and ImpactsFrench-language works237,207