Automated Segmentation of Spinal Muscles From Upright Open MRI Using a Multiscale Pyramid 2D Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial. OBJECTIVE: To implement an algorithm enabling the automated segmentation of spinal muscles from open magnetic resonance images in healthy volunteers and patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Understanding spinal muscle anatomy is critical to diagnosing and treating spinal deformity.Muscle boundaries can be extrapolated from medical images using segmentation, which is usually done manually by clinical experts and remains complicated and time-consuming. METHODS: Three groups were examined: two healthy volunteer groups (N = 6 for each group) and one ASD group (N = 8 patients) were imaged at the lumbar and thoracic regions of the spine in an upright open magnetic resonance imaging scanner while maintaining different postures (various seated, standing, and supine). For each group and region, a selection of regions of interest (ROIs) was manually segmented. A multiscale pyramid two-dimensional convolutional neural network was implemented to automatically segment all defined ROIs. A five-fold crossvalidation method was applied and distinct models were trained for each resulting set and group and evaluated using Dice coefficients calculated between the model output and the manually segmented target. RESULTS: Good to excellent results were found across all ROIs for the ASD (Dice coefficient >0.76) and healthy (dice coefficient > 0.86) groups. CONCLUSION: This study represents a fundamental step toward the development of an automated spinal muscle properties extraction pipeline, which will ultimately allow clinicians to have easier access to patient-specific simulations, diagnosis, and treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".