MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MONASTERIES OF THE TVER HALF OF THE BEZHETSKAYA PYATINA AT THE END OF THE 15TH - 16TH CENTURIES: LOCALIZATION, LAND OWNERSHIP

2021· article· ru· W4200022897 on OpenAlex
Юлия Владимировна Степанова

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Тверского государственного университета Серия История · 2021
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndependence (probability theory)Quarter (Canadian coin)Land tenureAccessionAncient historyPeriod (music)HistoryState (computer science)ArchaeologyGeographyArtAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статья посвящена монастырям и монастырскому землевладению в Тверской половине Бежецкой пятины в конце XV - XVI в. Основными источниками являются писцовые книги, привлекается актовый материал, описания XIX - начала ХХ в. В общей сложности выявлена информация о десяти монастырях, девять из которых возникло в XVI в. Наиболее ранним, предположительно, является Иоанно-Богословский монастырь в волости Удомля. Размеры монастырей Тверской половины Бежецкой пятины были невелики, землевладения располагались в непосредственной близости от самих монастырей. Более крупными являлись владения новгородских обителей - Воскресенского на Мячине, Кириллова, Юрьева, Троицкого Млёвского. В целом монастырское землевладение в Тверской половине Бежецкой пятины после присоединения Новгорода к Московскому государству уступало размерам владений Хутынского и Аркажского монастырей на этой территории в период новгородской самостоятельности. Небольшие размеры монастырского землевладения и малое количество монастырей на изучаемой территории объясняется ее периферийностью по отношению к Новгороду. Возникшие в XVI в. монастыри находились на сухопутных и водных путях сообщения. Упадок монастырского хозяйства наблюдается с последней четверти XVI в. Формирование систем приписных монастырей в XVII в., вероятно, являлось попыткой выхода из кризиса путем консолидации монастырских ресурсов. The article is devoted to the monasteries and monastery land ownership in the Tver half of the Bezhetskaya pyatina at the end of the 15th - 16th centuries. The main sources are the scribe books, acts, descriptions of the 19th - early 20th centuries. In total, information was revealed about ten monasteries, nine of which arose in the 16th centuries. The earliest, presumably, is the John Theological Monastery in the Udomlya volost. The size of the monasteries of the Tver half of the Bezhetskaya pyatina was very small, the land ownership was usually located in the immediate vicinity of the monasteries themselves. The larger ones were the lands of the Novgorod monasteries - the monastery of the Resurrection on Myachino, Kirillov, Yuryev, as well as the monastery of the St. Trinity Mlevsky.In general, the monastery land ownership in the Tver half of the Bezhetskaya pyatina after the accession of the Novgorod to the Moscow state was very small and inferior to the size of the lands of the Khutynsky and Arkazhsky monasteries in this territory during the period of Novgorod independence. Small scales of monastery land ownership and a small number of monasteries in the area under the research are explained by its periphery in relation to Novgorod. At the same time, the monasteries that arose in the 16th century were on land roads and waterways. The decline of the monastery economy has been observed since the last quarter of the 16th century. The formation of systems of ascribed monasteries in the 17th century was probably an attempt to overcome the crisis by the consolidation of the monastery resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it