MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200040825 · doi:10.1002/smll.202103174

Cu<sub>2−</sub><i><sub>x</sub></i>S<i><sub>x</sub></i> Capped AuCu Nanostars for Efficient Plasmonic Photothermal Tumor Treatment in the Second Near‐Infrared Window

2021· article· en· W4200040825 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Yu, Tingyu Peng, Jinfeng Zhang, Xiaoxuan Liu, Ye Pan, Dengfeng Ge, Long Zhao, Federico Rosei, Jianming Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersJiangsu UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotothermal therapyPlasmonMaterials scienceSurface plasmon resonanceInfraredNanotechnologyNanoparticleOptoelectronicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Plasmonic nanohybrids are promising photo energy conversion materials in photoelectronics and biomedicine, due to their unique surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Au and Cu 2− x S x nanostructures with strong SPR in the near‐infrared (NIR) spectral region are classic plasmonic systems used to convert NIR photons into heat for photothermal therapy (PTT). The rational design of the Au/Cu 2− x S x nanohybrids is expected to induce better photothermal conversion; however, the construction of such hybrids via wet‐chemistry methods with a well‐controlled interfacial structure is still challenging. Here, the synthesis of an AuCu Star/Cu 2 −x S x nanohybrid is reported, where the Cu 2− x S x components are selectively grown on the AuCu nanostar tips to form “caps”. The spatial formation of the Cu 2− x S x caps on star tips is mainly governed by surfactant concentration, tip curvature, and experimental manipulation. The nanohybrids show low cytotoxicity and superior photothermal conversion efficiency, enabling robust PTT to kill cancer cells in the second NIR window. Numerical simulation reveals that the coupling of Cu 2− x S x on nanostar tips generates strong interfacial electric field, improving photothermal conversion. Moreover, the spatial separation structure favors the continuous flow of hot charge carriers to produce active radicals, further promoting the tumor treatment effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSmallSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207