Crystal structures and functional analysis of the ZnF5-WWE1-WWE2 region of PARP13/ZAP define a new mode of engaging poly(ADP-ribose)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT PARP13/ZAP acts against multiple viruses through recognizing and promoting degradation of cytoplasmic viral mRNA. PARP13 has four N-terminal Zn-finger motifs that bind CG-rich nucleotide sequences, and a C-terminal ADP ribosyltransferase fold similar to other PARPs. A central region predicted to contain a fifth Zn-finger and two tandem WWE domains is implicated in binding poly(ADP-ribose); however, there are limited insights into the structure and function of this PARP13 region (ZnF5-WWE1-WWE2). Here, we present crystal structures of ZnF5-WWE1-WWE2 from mouse PARP13 in complex with ADP-ribose and with ATP. ZnF5-WWE1-WWE2 crystallized as a dimer with major contacts formed between WWE1 and WWE2 originating from different monomers, indicative of a more compact monomeric arrangement of the tandem WWE domains. Solution scattering experiments and biophysical analysis indicated a monomer in solution, suggesting that the crystal dimer represents domain swapping that could potentially represent a PARP13 conformation assumed when signaling viral RNA detection. The crystal structure and binding studies demonstrate that WWE2 interacts with ADP-ribose and ATP, whereas WWE1 does not have a functional binding site. The shape of the WWE2 binding pocket disfavors interaction with the ribose-ribose linkage of poly(ADP-ribose). Binding studies with poly(ADP-ribose) ligands indicate that WWE2 serves as an anchor for preferential binding to the terminal end of poly(ADP-ribose), and the composite structure of ZnF5-WWE1-WWE2 forms an extended surface to engage polymer chains of ADP-ribose. This model represents a novel mode of poly(ADP-ribose) recognition and provides a structural framework for investigating poly(ADP-ribose) impact on PARP13 function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".