EXTENSIVE ORBITAL AND PARAPHARYNGEAL EMPHYSEMA REQUIRING URGENT CANTHOTOMY AND CANTHOLYSIS AFTER PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The authors report the emergent management of a case of orbital and parapharyngeal emphysema causing orbital compartment syndrome and signs of peripheral neuropathy days after pars plana vitrectomy. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 20-year-old woman underwent 3-port 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in the right eye for total retinal detachment under general anesthesia. All sclerotomies were secured with 7-0 polyglactin 910 (Vicryl; Ethicon) sutures before instillation of 15% C3F8 gas. On the third postoperative day, the patient presented with a 3-mm proptosis, near-total ophthalmoplegia, jaw protrusion, head deviation, tongue protrusion, and facial twitching. Computed tomography showed extensive subcutaneous gas in the right orbit and bilateral parapharyngeal spaces, and a tethered right optic nerve with globe tenting. A decision was made to perform urgent lateral canthotomy and cantholysis. Three hours after canthotomy and cantholysis, her neurologic signs had resolved except for intermittent tongue protrusion, which resolved thereafter. At postoperative Week 7, the patient's vision was 20/70 and her intraocular pressure was 13 mmHg. CONCLUSION: To the authors' knowledge, this is the only report of a modern small-gauge vitrectomy procedure being complicated by orbital compartment syndrome and extensive emphysema causing peripheral neuropathy, and successfully treated with urgent canthotomy and cantholysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".