Traduction et étude de validation de la version française du « Sexual Self Esteem Inventory-Women-Short Form, SSEI-W-SF » (IESS-F-VC)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'inventaire de l'estime de soi sexuelle pour les femmes (SSEI-W-SF) est un inventaire anglophone créé par Paula Doyle Zeanah (école de médecine de l'université d'État de la Louisiane) et J. Conrad Schwarz (université du Connecticut). Il s'agit de la version abrégée du SSEI-W. Cet inventaire a été développé pour évaluer les réactions affectives aux auto-évaluations de la sexualité. L'objet de cet article est de mettre au point une version française de l'inventaire SSEI-W-SF (IESS-F-VC) et d'effectuer une première étude de validation. Dans le cadre de notre troisième étude, nous avions soumis un questionnaire contenant quatre échelles à un échantillon de 850 femmes francophones « tout-venant » (Belgique, France, Canada) : la version française du SSEI-W-SF, la version française du MBSQR-AS (Multidimensional Body Self Questionnaire Relations-Appearance Scales) réalisée par Untas, Koleck, Rascle & Borteyrou (2009), une version française de l'échelle de l'estime corporelle (BES), et la version française du SATAQ (Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire) réalisée par Rousseau, Valls & Chabrol (2010). Pour cette recherche de validation d'échelle, nous avons mesuré la cohérence interne de ces différentes échelles par le coefficient alpha de Cronbach. La validité interne du SSEI-W-SF a été déterminée grâce à une analyse en composantes principales, une analyse du Scree Plot confirmée par l'analyse parallèle, ainsi que par une analyse du tableau des matrices des composantes. La valeur du coefficient alpha de Cronbach était de 0,82 pour le SSEI-W-SF. Les coefficients de corrélation entre le score à l'échelle SSEI-W-SF et le score aux autres échelles de référence sont significatifs à p < .01 : SSEI-W-SF et MBSRQ-AE subscale : 0,58 ; SSEI-W-SF et MBSRQ-BAS subscale : 0,54 ; SSEI-W-SF et BES scale : 0,58 ; SSEI-W-SF et MBSRQ-OP subscale : −0,24 ; SSEI-W-SF et MBSRQ-SCW subscale : −0,21 ; SSEI-W-SF et SATAQ scale : −0,28. Les coefficients de corrélation entre le score à la sous-échelle MBSRQ-AO et le score à la SSEI-W-SF sont significatifs à p < 05 : 0,08. L'analyse en composantes principales de l'inventaire SSEI-W-SF, l'analyse du Scree Plot confirmée par l'analyse parallèle, ainsi que l'analyse du tableau des matrices des composantes ont permis de mettre en évidence une structure unidimensionnelle du SSEI-W-SF. La version française de cet inventaire présente donc des paramètres métrologiques satisfaisants, permettant de recommander son utilisation pour l'étude de l'estime de soi sexuelle chez la femme. The Sexual Self-Esteem Inventory for Women (SSEI-W-SF) is an English-language scale created by Paula Doyle Zeanah (Louisiana State University School of Medicine) and J. Conrad Schwarz (University of Connecticut). This is the abbreviated version of the SSEI-W. This inventory was developed to assess affective reactions to self-reports of sexuality. The purpose of this article is to develop a French version of the brief SSEI-W-SF scale and to conduct an initial validation study. In our third study, we submitted a questionnaire containing four scales to a sample of 850 French-speaking women (Belgium, France, Canada): the French version of the SSEI-W-SF, the French version of the MBSQR-AS (Multidimensional Body Self Questionnaire Relations-Appearance Scales) conducted by Untas, Koleck, Rascle & Borteyrou (2009), a French version of the Body Esteem Scale (BES), and the French version of the SATAQ (Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire) conducted by Rousseau, Valls & Chabrol (2010). For this scale validation research, we measured the internal consistency of these different scales by Cronbach's alpha. The internal validity of the SSEI-W-SF was determined through principal component analysis, a Scree Plot analysis confirmed by parallel analysis, as well as a component matrix table analysis. The Cronbach's alpha value was 0.82 for the SSEI-W-SF. The correlation coefficients between the SSEI-W-SF scale score and the score of the other reference scales were significant at P < . 01: SSEI-W-SF and MBSRQ-AE subscale: 0.58; SSEI-W-SF and MBSRQ-BAS subscale: 0.54; SSEI-W-SF and BES scale: 0.58; SSEI-W-SF and MBSRQ-OP subscale: −0.24; SSEI-W-SF and MBSRQ-SCW subscale: −0.21; SSEI-W-SF and SATAQ scale: −0.28. Correlation coefficients between the MBSRQ-AO subscale score and the SSEI-W-SF score were significant at P < 05: 0.08. The principal component analysis of the SSEI-W-SF, the Scree Plot analysis confirmed by the parallel analysis, as well as the analysis of the component matrix table revealed a unidimensional structure of the SSEI-W-SF. The French version of this inventory therefore presents satisfactory metrological parameters, allowing us to recommend its use for the study of sexual self-esteem in women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it