MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4200068062 · doi:10.2118/204576-ms

Time-Lapse Pulsed Neutron Well Logging in Oil Sands for Monitoring Steam Chamber Development

2021· article· en· W4200068062 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yonghwee Kim, Alexandr Kotov, David Chace

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringOil sandsSteam injectionLoggingWell loggingEnvironmental scienceVapor qualityEnhanced oil recoverySaturation (graph theory)Steam-assisted gravity drainageGeologyHeat exchangerMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology, although a relatively new oil recovery method, has already proved its value in economic development of heavy-oil sands in Western Canada. The SAGD process requires a lifetime monitoring of steam chamber growth to optimize reservoir development, improve oil recovery, and minimize environmental impact. Operators have widely used pulsed neutron well logs to monitor their life cycles of oil sand reservoirs. Time-lapse pulsed neutron logs acquired in observation wells enable operators to effectively track the growth of the steam chamber and identify the changes of formation fluid saturations. We present high-temperature pulsed neutron logging technology and an algorithm to quantify steam, heavy oil and water saturations in SAGD wells. One of the major challenges in well logging operation is to withstand the thermal shock from the steam chamber. Reservoir temperature often varies abruptly, by as much as 250 degrees C in a very short interval, so the logging tool must be stable in drastic temperature variations. Well logging conditions such as a steam-filled wellbore, extra completion hardware and bad cement quality are challenging factors as well. Furthermore, formation fluid saturation analysis in Canadian oil sands is typically complex because the formation water salinity is relatively fresh but varies, clay properties are not homogeneous, and SAGD operations create conditions in which three-phase fluids coexist in the formation. These environmental conditions make it difficult to rely only on commonly used thermal neutron capture cross-section measurements (formation sigma). In this paper, case study examples present the above-mentioned challenges and solutions to identify the multi-component formation fluids. The multi-detector pulsed neutron well logging instrument has been modified with a custom-designed heat flask to handle the extreme temperature variations in the SAGD environment. This heat-flask equipped instrument ensures a stable data acquisition in the presence of rapid and extreme temperature variation and enables a prolonged and time-efficient operation through effective heat management. For saturation analysis, we demonstrate an advanced algorithm to quantify three fluid components using a combination of gamma ray ratio and carbon/oxygen (C/O) measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207