MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4200081680 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1100332/v1

Impact of IRS-1 rs956115 and CYP2C19 rs4244285 Genotypes on Clinical Outcome of Patients Undergoing PCI

2021· preprint· en· W4200081680 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaxin Zong, Yingdan Tang, Tong Wang, Inam Ullah, Ke Xu, Jing Wang, Peng‐Sheng Chen, Zengguang Chen, Tiantian Zhu, Jun Chen, Jimin Li, Fei Wang, Lu Yang, Yuansheng Fan, Lu Shi, Xiaoxuan Gong, John W. Eikelboom, Yang Zhao, Chunjian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsConventional PCIOutcome (game theory)CYP2C19Internal medicineGenotypeMedicinePolitical scienceEconomicsBiologyGeneticsGeneMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) rs956115 is associated with vascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and concomitant diabetes. CYP2C19 rs4244285 modulates clopidogrel responsiveness and predicts outcome of CAD. We designed this study to explore the association between IRS-1 rs956115, CYP2C19 rs4244285, and platelet reactivity as well as 1-year outcome in patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods IRS-1 rs956115, CYP2C19 rs4244285 genotypes and platelet reactivity were assessed in 1611 post-PCI patients. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke over 1-year were evaluated. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the platelet reactivity among different genotypes of rs956115 and rs4244285. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis was used to estimate the association between genotypes of rs956115 and rs4244285 and risk of MACE.Results At 1 month, patients with rs956115 CG genotype had significantly lower level of residual ADP-induced platelet aggregation (PLADP) than those with CC genotype. PLADP significantly increased with the number of rs4244285 A alleles. Patients with rs956115 CG or GG genotype had a 2.09-fold higher risk of MACE than those with CC genotype (adjusted HR=2.09; 95%CI:1.04-4.19; P=0.0376), and those with rs4244285 GA genotype had a 2.19-fold higher risk than GG homozygotes (adjusted HR=2.19; 95%CI:1.13-4.24; P=0.0200). There was no significant difference in risk between AA and GG homozygotes. No interaction between rs956115 and rs4244285 was observed. Conclusions In post-PCI patients, rs956115 GG/CG and rs4244285 GA genotypes were associated with 2.09- and 2.19-fold cardiovascular risks respectively at 1-year follow-up. The effect of rs956115 appeared to be independent of known clinical predictors, while that of rs4244285 GA could be mediated by lower clopidogrel response. Trial registration: Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacokinetic Study of Clopidogrel (PPSC), NCT01968499. Registered October 17, 2013 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01968499?term=NCT01968499&draw=1&rank=1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases→French-language works237,207→